Mr. Answer Person Responds to Email
Published in the Delaware County Daily Times on March 27, 2001.
The readers write:
Mr.
Ominski:
You sniveling rat fascist. The proposed Bush tax cut will give more money back
to the rich than it will to the poor. When will you Republicans realize that the
poor need some breaks, too?
Delco Steve
Delco Steve:
If you wish to resort to name
calling, let’s be accurate. I am a sniveling rat capitalist.
The proposed Bush tax cut will provide the most benefits to those that pay the
most taxes. Think of it this way, if you want to go fishing, it might be a good
idea to find a lake, stream or ocean, because that is where you will find the
fish. In other words, you are not going to catch a lot of fish on the corner of
MacDade Boulevard and Fairview Road. Therefore, people that don’t pay taxes
won’t get any benefits from a tax cut, would they?
However, I do see your point that we need to do something to assist the poor. As
we have seen from previous liberal Democratic tax initiatives, taxes can be used
to change behavior, discourage certain actions and modify lifestyle decisions.
For instance, the luxury tax discouraged wealthy people from buying luxury cars
and yachts. Forget that it destroyed the boat-building industry, it had the
intended effect of stopping rich people from spending their money on luxury
items.
Another example would be the
"sin taxes" that discourage consumers from purchasing commodities that
our government deems to be "unhealthy."
With these thoughts in mind, I propose the "poor tax." Here is how it
works. We establish specific criteria to define what constitutes someone to be
poor. Those that fall into that category would then be taxed about $1,000 a
year. This tax will motivate poor people to become rich, and thereby, we will
eliminate poverty.
John Ominski,
Mr. Economics Person
Johnny O:
Maybe you could consider writing about something other than politics. We now
have an energy crisis, and California is experiencing regular blackouts. How
about animal rights or the environment? Or are these subjects you know nothing
about?
Mary J
Mary J:
With the exception of what makes women tick, I am an expert on every subject
known to MANkind.
Let me begin with animal rights and the environment, as they go hand in hand.
For example, the best environment for a cow would be upon a plate on my dinner
table, medium well done. Yes, I belong to that other PETA group, People Eating
Tasty Animals.
As for the energy crisis, I propose we bulldoze Alaska and start sucking all of
the oil out of the ground. The moose, bears and Eskimos can all go live next
door in Canada.
John Ominski,
Future Environment & Energy Czar
Mr.
Ominski:
What is your position on school uniforms?
Ridley Teacher
Dear Ridley Teacher:
Since I am considering running for the Ridley School Board next election, I’m
glad you asked. My platform will be the ‘Uniform Uniform.’
Every student, grades K through 12, will be required to wear a uniform. Further,
none of this green, white and tan color scheme. The official uniform will be
black and white stripes, with a unique number on the back to encourage
individuality.
My other position will be to require teachers to work 12 months a year. Since
there won’t be any students in the summer, imagine all of the new skills you
will be able to obtain.
Also, we will provide you with uniforms. However, they won’t be black and
white striped. They will be royal purple to reflect the dignity of your
profession. Can I count on your support?
John Ominski,
Future Ridley School Board Member
John Ominski is a member of the Daily Times’ Advisory Board. He can be
contacted via email at johneeo@rcn.com
© 2001
johneeo@rcn.com
Political Page
Ramblings Page
Humor Page